Further progress on fighting the HE reforms and the racist PREVENT agenda

Warwick For Free Education’s (WFFE) response to the University Council and Senate’s statements on the higher education reforms and Prevent.

News has come through regarding progress on two of our key campaigns: the higher education reforms and the University’s compliance with the government’s racist ‘counter-terrorism’ Prevent programme. These announcements are welcome, and almost entirely the product of the hard work of WFFE, the SU and staff members throughout the year.

The proposed higher education reforms are a neo-liberal project of forced marketisation: further tuition fee rises, entrance into the market of private for-profit providers, dodgy quality-survey metrics and the possibility of entire universities going bust. Prevent is widely condemned as a racist, ineffective part of the state’s security apparatus, creating “one of the most elaborate systems of surveillance ever seen in Britain,” according to the Institute of Race Relations.

WFFE helped spearhead a campaign in the 2015/16 year with Warwick UCU and sympathetic staff members against Prevent and the HE reforms. These links between students and University staff have undoubtedly made us stronger: we called a meeting of the Assembly – a democratic body of academics – during which staff overwhelming condemned the proposed reforms to Higher Education and the Prevent strategy.

Recently, it was announced that University Council, the University’s supreme governing body, has expressed “similar views” to the Assembly motions.  Vice Chancellor Stuart Croft has already met with universities minister Jo Johnson to raise concerns over the HE Paper. Both Council and Senate (the highest academic body at Warwick) lamented how little the views of universities have been taken into account during the progression of the HE Green Paper to a White Paper (something that, unfortunately, doesn’t come as much of a surprise).

Council discussed some of the problems with the HE reforms including visa issues for international students and the fact that the Teaching Excellence Framework does not measure teaching quality but merely “a set of metrics including historic rankings (e.g. of graduate earnings) and the National Student Survey (NSS)” – something we and the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts (NCAFC) have been arguing for years. Luckily for Council, NCAFC and the NUS are calling for a sabotage or boycott of the NSS, something WFFE will be driving forward on campus this year.

The Assembly also demanded minimum compliance with the government’s Prevent agenda. Disappointingly, Council has resolved that the University will continue its approach of “appropriate compliance”. It claims that it will ensure that academic freedom is protected and that implementation is “non-discriminatory”. Given how outrageously counter-productive, authoritarian and racist the policy is, it’s disgraceful that the University continues to do more than it is legally mandated to do to comply. This includes giving extensive trainings to University staff members – which were condemned in a letter from Warwick’s Residential Life Team as racist – and monitoring the Islamic prayer hall. A silver lining and avenue for continuing to pressure the administration, however, is that a working group – including SU president Luke Pilot, Warwick UCU president Justine Mercer and Charlotte Heath-Kelly from the politics department – has been set up to scrutinise how the University is interacting with Prevent. It seems that the entire SU sabb team are against Prevent, and the national environment is increasingly hostile to it. There is a real opportunity in the coming year to negotiate and push the University to adopt an approach of minimum compliance or even set a precedent by refusing to comply with Prevent. In our opinion it is high time that Warwick  acknowledge its strategic power and influence and explore the possibility of refusing to cooperate with racist laws.

It’s no doubt that our efforts – raising awareness, occupying the finance office, holding a road blockade and march, lobbying the University – have been instrumental in holding the University to account on these issues. We will be continuing this work, in solidarity with staff and the SU, in the 2016/17 year.  

Council Minutes: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/gov/committees/council/minutes/2016-05-18_council_minutes_open_approved_for_upload_to_web.pdf

Senate Minutes: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/gov/committees/senate/minutes/senate_2016-06-08_unconfirmed_minutes.pdf

Assembly Motions: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/insite/news/intnews2/assembly_mar2016/assembly_agenda_1

 

WFFE’s Second Year: A Brief History

After a barnstorming first year – during which Warwick For Free Education (WFFE) became national news, went to court, were battled with an unprecedented High Court injunction (still outstanding), destabilisedVice-Chancellor, forged the most left-wing environment seen at the University since the days of Red Warwick, and helped force Warwick to divest from fossil fuels – we continued to mobilise, push forward our demands with management, and inculcate a culture of struggle throughout our second year. We take a look back and reflect on everything we organised and contributed to during 2015/16.

Chris White MP

Chris White, Leamington’s MP, fleeing our first action of the year

Term 1: Our first term was dominated by the national agenda. With the first series of major higher education reforms since 2010 tabled in a green paper, we kicked off the year with a small picket outside the office of Leamington’s eminently charismatic Conservative MP, Chris White. After calling the police on us, he attempted to engage in dialogue for around 30 seconds before shutting down his office and scuttling away. 

The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts – to which we are affiliated – went into overdrive to pull off a great national demo in London on November 4. We managed to achieve the second-largest contingent in the country (after Sheffield), and forged closer relations between our new and old members in the process. At the demo, clashes with police outside the Department for Business and Innovation led to hundreds of students tearing through the streets of London in a moment of unchoreographed liberation: the streets really were ours as we impulsively turned left, right, right and left, stopping traffic as we went.

12301709_649207915222212_1868089618674115612_n

Sit-in outside the VC’s office to commemorate Dec. 3, 2014; one year on

Term 1 also saw the first occurrence of something which would become common for us: early-morning starts to join the picket lines. This time, we joined striking further education workers at the local Leamington campus of Warwickshire college (we would later join junior doctors and striking Warwick academics). We also supported a nationally-coordinated day of action in defence of international students on Nov. 17, and began to raise alarms over revelations that Warwick had been lobbying to be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. The anniversary of Dec. 3, 2014 – during which WFFE activists were sprayed with CS gas, threatened with Tasers, arrested and outrageously convicted – came and went with a small sit-in outside the Vice Chancellor’s office. We are still waiting for the Independent Police Complaints Commission’s report into the events – and for an apology from Warwick’s management – although a former member did win his law suit against the IPCC’s exoneration of one of the officers involved. 

Term 2: This term was our most eventful of the year. After hosting NCAFC’s women and non-binary conference which saw activists from Sisters Uncut, the Kurdish women’s movement and elsewhere come to campus change was supposedly afoot, as the disgraced Nigel Thrift left his post and fled to China. A newer, younger, slicker Vice Chancellor took over: Stuart Croft. We greeted him in true WFFE style: with an occupation of the Finance Office. Years of frustration with Warwick’s management were bubbling over, and we wanted to test whether the new Croft-era would be any different to the Thrift regime.

After a disastrous ‘Question Time’ performance on his first day, Croft dropped everything during our Finance Office occupation and agreed to meet with us in the SU. We discussed our four main campaign priorities: the injunction, maintenance grant cuts, freedom of information, and the ‘counter-terrorism’ Prevent agenda, achieving some seeming concessions on each.

12778987_681711128638557_7225474863921008069_o

WFFE marches through campus on #GrantsNotDebt demo, Feb. 26

We continued campaigning on these four key areas and have won some significant progress on each. Plans for exempting universities from the Freedom of Information Act were dropped nationally. A student-management meeting on how Warwick interacts with Prevent was held, spawning a student-staff working group to permanently scrutinise the University’s conduct in this area. Stuart Croft publicly expressed alarm over the cuts to maintenance grants. And we hear that a proposal for scrapping the injunction will be brought to the upper echelons of the University in September.

These campaigns were run on a number of fronts: we engaged students in conversations through leafleting, published thought-pieces in student media, passed motions through the SU (around seven motions were successfully brought by WFFE members throughout the year), maintained our social media presence, did creative public actions, and held a successful rally, march and road blockade (which sparked significant consequent debate). Even during graduation our members were still agitating over the injunction.

1970935_687250451417958_206347704990828800_n.jpg

Students and staff on the day of the Assembly victory

Crucially, we spent a lot of energy building effective student-staff solidarity with elements of the main academic staff union, UCU. We held regular meetings to form a joint campaign over the higher education reforms and Prevent, something we will be continuing in the coming year. Together, the student-staff group overwhelmingly passed motions through a specially-called meeting of Assembly, the democratic body of staff on campus. Victories come much more often when staff and students work in unison.

Term 2, alongside everything else, also saw an entire week set aside for SU elections. Despite the efforts of some in the student media to paint WFFE as an isolated, hated group, our members or candidates supportive of our aims were nearly-uniformly elected, some by significant margins. We now have the most progressive SU sabb team in recent memory. This opens up the door for major victories in the year ahead.

Term 3 was, of course, much quieter, with a few small engagements with a staff strike and an open day action. Most prominently, several of our members took time out of the revision schedule to combat the reactionary NUS leave campaign; again, scoring a massive victory.

12593694_687991948010475_7664547356576874706_o

WFFE members at Movement for Justice’s ‘Shut Down Yarl’s Wood’ demo, March 12 

If this wasn’t enough, throughout the year we worked to support external struggles, from joining Movement for Justice’s efforts to shut down Yarl’s Wood detention centre, to supporting a NUT-UCU strike at Northampton, to organising a protest at the Israeli arms company Elbit with Birmingham Palestine Action, to attending Kurdish solidarity and SOAS Justice for Cleaners demos in London.

Naturally, such an active year took its toll on the group, and we are planning to rethink elements of our approach after we recharge over summer in light of the experiences of the last two years. With the Tory government launching attacks on everyone from students in England to women of colour in Coventry to Yemeni children, the Left is needed as much as ever. WFFE will continue to contribute to a radical movement for justice and equality here at Warwick and beyond.